Getting Old

This past week has been very rough for me, but since you are my friends, I wanted to share it with you. Very few of you know me personally, and since I don’t make it a habit to go spouting off personal details every chance I get, many of you don’t know about my father. I don’t talk about him much because, frankly, there isn’t much to tell. We never had a great relationship, at least not since I was a child, so we were never very close. He left me live with him for a short time as an adult (I’m not proud of needing the help), but it didn’t end well. So I kept my distance, leaving my sister to deal with him. He started having health problems a little over a decade ago. He never lived a healthy lifestyle; he was a weekend alcoholic (not to lessen his alcoholism, but he only drank on the weekends – so it’s more an identifier than an excuse), and a chain smoker. He had to quit drinking because drunk driving laws were getting harsher. He had to quit smoking, but he replaced tobacco with caffeine. So the congestive cardiopulmonary failure wasn’t a surprise.

The dementia was.

Now I will tell this part of the story with a bit of a caveat; Anne, my sister, has dealt with much more of this than I have, and she knows this tale far more intimately. I’m telling much of this second hand. It started small, like these things always do. We didn’t realize anything was the matter with my father until he kept being admitted into the hospital for high blood sugar and congestive heart failure – his sugar was off the charts and his Diabetes was 100% preventable.  My sister and I dug into his cabinets and discovered that he was eating the worst sort of food imaginable and wasn’t taking his medicine. At first, we just thought it was because he didn’t have money (another issue entirely), but he was forgetting to take it. The bottles were mostly full and some of them expired. Then he started to tell the nursing staff that he was an engineer at Wright-Pat (Wright-Patterson Air Force Base – it’s in Fairborn, the town he lived in). My father never went to college, and certainly wasn’t an engineer. And he hadn’t been on the base since my Grandfather worked there in the 60′s and 70′s. He’d always been a fantastic liar, but he would never have done something like this unless he was no longer able to tell the lies from the truth. Then on one visit, he told my sister that the guy was really nice (meaning his roommate in the hospital), but that he wasn’t going to keep letting dad live in his garage forever. He started babbling incoherently, having trouble completing thoughts. He wouldn’t call me by my name, though he knew I was his son. After he had a small stroke (and being told that he’s probably had dozens of TIA’s – Transient Ischemic Attacks or mini-strokes), we tired to put him in a care facility. In the end, my sister decided that she would care for him at home, even though I’m pretty sure that he wouldn’t have done the same for her. She’s a saint for doing this, considering the shit he’s put her through over the years. Quite honestly, I would have left him in the home, but I’m really not that great of a son.

Boy, were they wrong…

Well, in any event, it’s coming to an end. He won’t participate in physical therapy anymore, and he won’t acknowledge my sister, so she needs to move him into the care facility permanently. He doesn’t have Alzheimer’s Disease, he has Dementia, brought on by the combination of poor lifestyle and the cumulative damage of all the TIA’s. My father is 67, hardly an age we heavily associate with geriatric disease. Most people his age are just starting to retire and complain about their arthritis. He can’t remember what arthritis is.

All of this got me thinking. I’ve talked about Medicine as a general topic in the past, but I’ve never really been as personally connected to one of my topics as I am this one (though “Soldiers” hit a little closer to home than most). The idea of escaping death is as old as humanity itself. The paragons of our collective consciousness are either immortal or have cheated death (by any number of means). Our religious icons are immortal, our superheroes rise from the dead (and not in the bad way) and the heroes in our stories seem to live forever. Seriously, did it ever cross your mind that Luke might actually die on the Death Star II? Of course not. Did we really believe that Superman was really dead? Not for a second. The final Act in Serenity? We all knew Mal would beat the bad guy, and that when the blast doors opened, River would still be standing. I suppose that’s why they never really tackled the idea of aging, and the diseases of aging.

Even in Star Trek, they hadn’t solved the problem of aging, though they often skirted the subject. The episodes  “Return to Tomorrow” and “The Schizoid Man” featured the idea of immortality by preserving our brain wave patterns (and subsequently uploading them into another vessel) and more than once the crews of the various versions of the Enterprise were faced with the prospect of rapid uncontrolled aging. In the Star Trek episode, “The Deadly Years”, McCoy comments that Kirk is showing signs of aging that included Rheumatism, implying that in the 23rd Century, we haven’t conquered this painful dilemma, even though we can travel faster than the speed of light. Another anomaly is that while they previously had the technology to preserve people (presented both in the OS and in TNG), it seems to have been something they no longer had a need or desire for. To the other extreme, in Logan’s Run, people were killed off before they had a chance to get old and experience any of the inconveniences of old age. A similar idea was presented in the 2011 Justin Timberlake  vehicle  In Time, in which people stop aging at 25, but are genetically engineered to only live one more year beyond that. Living longer means that you have to purchase time, so only the rich have long lives, and some are essentially immortal (because you have more time to make more money to buy more time to make more money to buy more time… you get the picture).

Our Science Fiction is also filled with the idea of being frozen (either cryogenically or accidentally). One of the more well-known instances of living beyond one’s time is that of Buck Rogers, who was frozen in space (or trapped in a radioactive cave, depending on which story you read) for nearly 500 years. Perhaps one of the most famous villains in all Science Fiction, Khan Noonien Singh, was also a man displaced in time. In the original Star Trek episode, “Space Seed”, Khan and his merry band of genetic supermen were found, still preserved, on a pre-warp “sleeper ship”. They were put to sleep while the ship traversed the long distances of space travel during a time that such travels would have taken a lifetime (the S.S. Botany Bay should have left Earth in 1996). The technology doesn’t become any more advanced in the 21st century because the Enterprise-D encounters another sleeper ship (this one for people on death’s door) and of the 12 original passengers, only 3 survive (in contrast to the 72 of 84 from the Botany Bay – presumably because the world’s smartest people were on board and knew how to make it work better before they launched). Those survivors were cured of their previously incurable ailments (an aneurism, heart disease and cirrhosis). I would like to think that something like Alzheimer’s would be on that list, but in the very final episode of  TNG, Picard’s time jumping as seen to be just his old mind playing tricks on him, implying that Dementia is still something humankind can’t solve.

I know that we live a lot longer than we used to (in the First World), and that we’ve made a lot of advances in medicine in the last 100 years. But more often than not, we allow out superstitions and worse, our greed, get in the way of real progress. Curing an illness isn’t as profitable as profitable as treating it. And despite what Futurama would have us believe, freezing people isn’t a particularly practical solution in the long term. In a spritual sense, why would you try to prolong life when the whole goal is immortality in the next life? It’s difficult to watch Dementia ravage the once vibrant and intelligent mind of my father knowing that there could be a solution hiding somewhere in Science Fiction that we just haven’t developed yet.

Unless I can find a transporter buffer to keep him in for the next few decades, well… I’ll be over here, missing a man who’s still with me, but isn’t really there.

We The Fans…

The other day, I was talking to a friend of mine (@JediJayne… you should follow her if you aren’t already) about my old Star Wars v. Star Trek article. I noted that I was surprised that it was still getting attention nearly two years after it’s publication, even during the period when I wasn’t active. It been, by far, my most read piece, and the one that generated the most traffic and comments. I just answered one two weeks ago, in fact. There is a lot of passion on the topic, more than I realized. So I started thinking about the fans of science fiction, and how rabid we really are.

Yes I said “rabid”, as in the foaming-at-the-mouth, crazed-look-in-the-eye, incoherently-babbling kind of rabid. And it’s been this way, well, since Star Trek. I mean I imagine that it’s the natural offshoot of how that generation felt about comic books (while they weren’t the original generation of comic book fans, they were the most populous – we’re talking Silver Age comics as a time reference); and as they matured and turned to movies and television, they took their ideas about fandom with them. These are our parents, really, the generation of kids that grew up on Star Trek and raised us on the reruns. And we grew up with so much more, and seeing those images come to life, and now we have children of our own. And now, with the internet at our disposal, and thousands of pages devoted to the science fiction genre of your choice, fandom has taken on a whole new meaning.

Now, imagine that these were actually fans of “Days of Our Lives”… You can’t, can you?

So what is it about science fiction that makes us love it so dearly. I mean there are conventions all the time, but people don’t dress up in costume for them. And let’s face it, the American Dental Associations convention doesn’t hold a candle to Comicon or Dragon*Con (though there probably are more shiny objects at the ADA show). And it goes beyond just “loving” a show or concept. People take their fandom seriously, both in the form of man-hours spent on a project (like a costume or website) or in the defense of their love. Here’s an example: I went to Dragon*Con in 2003 and I came across (for the first time) Firefly fans. They were having a discussion when one of the people involved chimed in “You seriously can’t compare Firefly to Star Trek…”. I thought it was going to come to blows. No, seriously. The Firefly fans banded together and began to defend their faith in the short-lived enterprise against the megalith that is Star Wars. And they were adamant about how important Firefly is, not only as science fiction, but as commentary on our lives today. And the other guy (presumably a Trekkie… sorry, Trekker makes you sound like you spend 14 hours a day on a bike in the Andes, and lets face it… none of you do), just kept saying, “I just don’t see it… it’s just the Old West in space…”. Of course, that statement is dripping with so much irony it’s leaving a rust stain on the floor, but that isn’t the point.

What is my point? I suppose I’m trying to figure out what makes science fiction different than, say,  fans of action franchises, or romance franchises. Soap Opera fans can be very loyal and dedicated, but they didn’t organize conventions to meet and share ideas and dress up like their favorite characters. Comic Book fans are almost as bad, but there’s a certain amount of common ground to be had, so the rules of a “fight” between characters can be easily rationalizes. Superman beats The Hulk, Batman beats Wolverine, etc. What is it about Science Fiction that draws in the obsession in people to the point they become belligerent? I mean, I love Greek Mythology, but I’m not willing to throw down with you because you think Zeus isn’t as cool as Takhisis.

There are even fights WITHIN groups of fans over what the universe’s “canon” actually is. I get this all the time on my Star Wars thread (because Lucas, the creator (and in my eyes, the end-all-be-all in terms of what is canon, since it was his idea), has gone on record as saying that he only views what happens on screen as “canon”. However, Lucas doesn’t “own” Star Wars anymore, and LucasArts, the company in charge of those rights, says that they try to include ALL ideas into “canon” provided that it doesn’t conflict with something that Lucas himself created (i.e. they won’t “canonize” a story in which Luke is killed by Vader during their first confrontation because that contradicts Lucas’ own story… but they were forced to accept midichlorians… tsk tsk tsk… shame really). With Star Wars, Roddenberry himself was the problem. He would come up with an idea, then when someone (or even he) came up with an idea he thought was better later (even if it was years later), he would retcon everything to include the new idea. Let’s face it Star Trek’s continuity is worse than Marvel’s or DC’s… and that’s actually saying something.

I recently had a discussion with a co-worker where he commented that possibly the works themselves are the cause of the problem. If we look to two of the modern “fathers” of the genre, Isaac Asimov and Arthur C. Clarke, even they disagreed on the subject matter. The now-famous “Clarke-Asimov Treaty” was devised, mostly in tongue-in-cheek fashion, so settle disputes about their work easily. It states that Clarke is the better Science Fiction writer while Asimov the better science writer. Do you see the distinction? They were making fun of us and we didn’t even know it. But it speaks to the power of science fiction to pull at us emotionally.

I wonder, if maybe it’s the fantastic elements that make us obsess. I mean it’s really only the positive (or mostly positive) franchises that have such obsessive followings. I should probably take a moment to establish what “positive” and “negative” mean in this context. Those franchises that have a generally happy feel and ending, or present the future/genre in positive light are… well.. “positive”. Anything dystopic, cyberpunk or apocalyptic would fall into “negative”. So Star Wars, Firefly and Star Trek are each generally positive, while Terminator, Alien, and Blade Runner would be “negative”. And for the record, BSG is “positive” because even though humans faced annihilation, they did with honor and hope. If that’s not “positive” I don’t know what is.

So back to my thought – only the “positive” franchsies seem to have this effect on people. You just don’t see Terminator fans arguing with Mad Max fans over which future is more bleak. I suppose it could have happened once… maybe twice… but it just isn’t the same as Star Trek Fans arguing with Star Wars fans over whether Q is stronger than The Force (that’s actually been said to me).  Or worse, bickering over who would win in a fist fight (in their prime), Kirk or Picard/Riker. As if they would ever fight. Of course, it doesn’t help matters that there are dozens of websites (again painstakingly cared for by said fanatics) that give all sorts of information on the “technical” aspects of the universes in question. The problem is that most of these, even when they are cited, contradict other information, and let’s face it, anybody can put anything on the internet. What makes matters worse though, is that the anonymity the Internet provides makes these discussions degrade into name-calling affairs rather quickly, and they tend to involve many more than just the truly faithful fans. I call these people “pseudo-fanatics” because they aren’t really fans and “fanaticism” in my experience, is usually incited by people who aren’t really faithful to the cause, but rather just like causing problems (or having power over others).

So, in closing, I offer this: maybe we are just meant to be raving lunatics when it comes to our favorite science fiction. But can we at least play nice about it? After all, it’s bad enough that we have so many stereotypes about a lack of girlfriends/boyfriends, hygiene and social skills. We don’t need to add internet trolling and hating to the list. On Twitter, I follow Wil Wheaton (@wilw), Nathan Fillion (@NathanFillion) and Carrie Fisher (@CarrieFFisher) and my brain doesn’t melt and run out my left ear. I promise.

Besides, in a fight between Star Wars, Star Trek, Firefly, BSG and Stargate, we all know who would win…

The Zentradi would.